Defamation – Twitter

Cosgrove Gaynard Solicitors

In addition to bringing a defamation action against the broadcasters of a show, being BBC and ITV (one of which we believe has already settled for a cash sum), following the inaccurate Newsnight report on November 2nd, Lawyers for Lord McAlpine in the UK have threatened legal action against Twitter users. They have identified up to 10,000 allegedly defamatory tweets about the former Tory party treasurer.

Defamation – Twitter

In addition to bringing a defamation action against the broadcasters of a show, being BBC and ITV (one of which we believe has already settled for a cash sum), following the inaccurate Newsnight report on November 2nd , Lawyers for Lord McAlpine in the UK have threatened legal action against Twitter users . They have identified up to 10,000 allegedly defamatory tweets about the former Tory party treasurer.

There has been a request by the legal team for Lord McAlpine for a fixed fee donation and an apology to mitigate any libel action. He has confirmed that all compensation received from Twitter users will be donated to Children in Need.

This situation clearly sets out the modern issue of social media in the eyes of defamation laws. Users have tweeted and retweeted these tweets (approximately 1000 tweets and 9,000 retweets) however both in essence are treated as printed / publishing and so are at fault.

Notably in America, Kevin Clash, who was the voice of Elmo in Sesame Street, was falsely accused of an indecent matter which involved a similar twitter storm however is not threatening legal action against Twitter users. This is because, in America, the burden in libel cases falls on the claimant to prove the defendant knew the information was false, or likely to be false, or at least was not acting in good faith.

In Ireland and also with reference to this case in Britain, the defendant must demonstrate that the accusation is true to be a full defence in a defamation case.

The question may be asked as to why Lord McAlpine is not suing Twitter itself. He is not the presenters but the broadcasters of the programme and so similarly this asks the question as to why he is not pursuing Twitter. One would assume legal advice would include taking an action against Twitter aswell who should have some responsibility for its output.

A code of practice for social-media providers may be the answer however as matters stand it is important to note that social media forums are subject to the same laws as old fashioned print and the same sanctions under Defamation laws apply.

For more on Defamation see :www.cgsolicitors.ie/defamation

© Cosgrove Gaynard Solicitors. All rights reserved

All news
Why Ireland Is the Correct Jurisdiction to Sue Facebook (and Other Platforms) for Influencer Payment or Demonetisation Disputes

Facebook and Instagram are owned by Meta Platforms, which operates its European services through Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, headquartered in Dublin. Under Meta’s commercial terms, if the dispute is with Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, the claim must be resolved in the courts of the Republic of Ireland and Irish law governs the dispute. This contractual clause is critical for influencers and advertisers because it effectively establishes Ireland as the contractual jurisdiction and Irish courts as the forum for legal disputes.

Text Link
Social Media Influencer & Content Creator Law - Payment Disputes

Our media and entertainment law practice advises and represents content creators and influencers in disputes relating to social media monetisation, advertising income, brand sponsorships and platform payment disputes.We act for creators and digital media businesses in litigation and dispute resolution arising from non-payment of advertising revenue, breach of creator agreements and misuse of digital content.

Text Link
Pre-Application Engagement with the Central Bank of Ireland for MiCA Authorisation

The authorisation process under the Markets in Crypto‑Assets Regulation (MiCA) requires firms intending to operate as Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) in the European Union to obtain regulatory approval from their national competent authority. In Ireland, this authority is the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI).While the formal application process is the second stage of authorisation, firms are strongly encouraged to engage with the regulator early through a pre-application phase. This initial engagement enables the CBI to understand the proposed business model and provides firms with valuable regulatory feedback before submitting a full application.

Text Link
Property Solicitors Dublin – Cosgrove Gaynard Solicitors

Cosgrove Gaynard Solicitors provides expert legal advice in residential and commercial property transactions throughout Dublin and across Ireland. Our property law team acts for buyers, sellers, landlords, tenants, developers, and investors, delivering efficient, practical, and results-focused legal services.With extensive experience handling property transactions in Dublin City and surrounding areas, we guide clients through every stage of the conveyancing and property process with clarity and confidence.

Text Link
How to Claim Compensation After a Road Traffic Accident in Ireland

At Cosgrove Gaynard Solicitors, we advise clients across Ireland on personal injury and road traffic accident claims. Our team can guide you through every stage of the process — from initial consultation to resolution. This guide explains how to claim compensation after a road traffic accident in Ireland, what steps to take, time limits involved, and how the process works.

Text Link
What does a crypto asset white paper have to contain to be MiCA Compliant in Ireland

Under MiCA, most public token offerings or exchange listings require a mandatory disclosure document called a crypto-asset white paper. It’s not marketing and not optional — it’s a legally prescribed document with strict content, liability, and formatting rules. Think of it as a regulated prospectus-lite for crypto.

Text Link