In a recent case in the Supreme Court of Israel, the Court held it was unlawful for Leumi Bank (the “Bank”) to restrict the banking activity of a company engaged in cryptocurrency activities. This precedent should signal a warning to other banks thinking of stifling the growth in cryptocurrencies through anticompetitive actions
In a recent case in the Supreme Court of Israel, the Court held it was unlawful for Leumi Bank (the “Bank”) to restrict the banking activity of a company engaged in cryptocurrency activities. This precedent should signal a warning to other banks thinking of stifling the growth in cryptocurrencies through anticompetitive actions.
The Supreme Court of Israel overturned an earlier ruling of June 2017 by the district judiciary court in Tel Aviv that had supported the Bank when Bits of Gold (the “Company”) had sought a court order after being denied service by Leumi. The case argued by the Bank centred around a perceived inability for Bitcoin (“BTC”) transactions to follow Israel’s anti-money laundering laws. The Bank also cited the Israeli law against gambling and instructions from the Bank of Israel as a further justification to block customer payments to BTC exchanges.
Anat Baron J, held, the Bank’s decision to terminate the Company’s account was based on an assumption that violations of the law would take place, however, the lack of any violations over the past five years supports the decision of undoing those restrictions. The Judge added:
“not intended to harm the bank’s rights to analyse with specificity every transaction that takes place with the bank account or to take any actions that are related to minimizing risks, which become transparent through the activities of the company.”
As more and more Banks admit that cryptocurrencies pose a business risk to traditional banking, it not unreasonable for one to feel that Banks may be using current legislation creatively to ensure they protect their bottom line. Here at Cosgrove Gaynard we are closing monitoring the situation. Should you require advice in this area, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our technology or litigation teams.
Landmark case for the inheritance of social media pages and other digital assets.Text Link
It is really not for the SEC to determine whether tokens are security; this is to be determined by legislation or for the courts to determine. To date no court has determined whether or not tokens are deemed to be securities. That said it is clear that the SEC has interpreted the matter and are finding tokens to be securities. There is a case currently ongoing in New York which may however become the first court in the world to rule on whether or not tokens are deemed to be securities.Text Link
Initial Coin Offerings (ICO's) are not just for technology companies . They are often the beginning of a digital revolution for existing Companies which are already established In their field whether it be healthcare, insurance, property or another industry. Despite some bad press, the tightening of regulation in jurisdictions such as in the US, and indeed Facebook and Twitter banning advertisements , money has been pouring into the ICO market with $3 billion raised through ICOs in the first two months of this year. This is half the value of all funds raised throughout 2017, according to Coindesk data.Text Link
The division of assets on a divorce is one of the most contentious issues facing both couples and family lawyers. With the advent of digital assets such as cryptocurrencies lawyers are having to consider digital assets and their division in the dissolution of a marriage more and more frequently.Text Link