Pressure is continually increasing for the introduction of legislation to provide for periodic payments in claims involving catastrophic injuries. A working group was set up in 2010 to review this area of law and it reported unanimously in 2010 that legislation was required to allow cases to be settled by way of periodic payments for such catastrophic injuries.
Pressure is continually increasing for the introduction of legislation to provide for periodic payments in claims involving catastrophic injuries*. A working group was set up in 2010 to review this area of law and it reported unanimously in 2010 that legislation was required to allow cases to be settled by way of periodic payments for such catastrophic injuries.
Pending this reform, it is clear from the latest catastrophic injuries claims that have come before the High Court recently that the courts are anticipating the introduction of legislation for periodic payments. The court has awarded lump sum interim payments with cases being adjourned for 18 months / 2 years to allow for this legislation to be introduced.
Currently, compensation is made by way of a lump sum which includes all future and past losses. This lump sum is increasingly hard to determine and in some cases can result in an injustice as one is taking a risk regarding the cost of future care, life expectancy of the plaintiff, returns on investments etc. The issue is that this lump sum payment may not be sufficient to cover the overall care requirements of the plaintiff especially if life expectancy is underestimated. Likewise if life expectancy is overestimated, this could result in the plaintiffs family inheriting a large lump sum. By comparison, if periodic payments were introduced these risks would be minimised.
A critical issue in introducing periodic payments is the provision of an appropriate index to guard against inflation costs for future care. In the UK for example, the Courts have measured inflation costs for future care against inflation in carers wages as opposed to a consumer price index.
Minister Shatter has confirmed that the drafting of the Civil Liability (Amendment) Bill will commence shortly to deal with this area. Cosgrove Gaynard Solicitors will keep you informed or any updates regarding this proposed legislation.
* In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement. This statement is made in compliance with Reg.8 of SI 518 of 2002.
Landmark case for the inheritance of social media pages and other digital assets.Text Link
It is really not for the SEC to determine whether tokens are security; this is to be determined by legislation or for the courts to determine. To date no court has determined whether or not tokens are deemed to be securities. That said it is clear that the SEC has interpreted the matter and are finding tokens to be securities. There is a case currently ongoing in New York which may however become the first court in the world to rule on whether or not tokens are deemed to be securities.Text Link
Initial Coin Offerings (ICO's) are not just for technology companies . They are often the beginning of a digital revolution for existing Companies which are already established In their field whether it be healthcare, insurance, property or another industry. Despite some bad press, the tightening of regulation in jurisdictions such as in the US, and indeed Facebook and Twitter banning advertisements , money has been pouring into the ICO market with $3 billion raised through ICOs in the first two months of this year. This is half the value of all funds raised throughout 2017, according to Coindesk data.Text Link
The division of assets on a divorce is one of the most contentious issues facing both couples and family lawyers. With the advent of digital assets such as cryptocurrencies lawyers are having to consider digital assets and their division in the dissolution of a marriage more and more frequently.Text Link